The Toronto Maple Leafs have been quiet in the offseason. However, a recent trade proposal suggests acquiring Calgary Flames’ captain Mikael Backlund. According to a trade scenario on PuckPedia’s PuckGM tool, the deal would send Timothy Liljegren, David Kampf, and a 2025 second-round pick to the Flames in exchange for Backlund.
At first glance, the trade seems straightforward. The Maple Leafs would gain a veteran center in Backlund, who could bolster their middle-six forward group. Meanwhile, the Flames would receive a promising defenseman in Liljegren, a functional defensive-minded center in Kampf, and a valuable draft pick. However, the proposed trade oversimplifies the situation and overlooks crucial aspects from Toronto’s perspective.
Related: Maple Leafs and the Jani Hakanpaa Injury: Now What?
Why Would the Maple Leafs Want Backlund?
While I don’t disrespect Backlund, he’s 35 and entering the final year of a two-year $9 million deal. While he has been a critical player for the Flames, including his recent captaincy, he’s nearing the end of his career. For a team like Calgary, which is currently rebuilding, giving up an aging player aligns well with their long-term goals. However, it makes no sense for the Maple Leafs.
Instead of plugging in Backlund to a middle-six forward spot, the Maple Leafs need to figure out how to get more of the organization’s youngsters into the lineup. Right now, too many are languishing off the big club’s roster. Backlund, as good and intelligent as he might be, would be a roadblock that would keep young Maple Leafs’ players on the sidelines.
The Maple Leafs need to focus on their more immediate need, prioritizing the development of younger talent and creating space for emerging prospects.
Trading Liljegren and Kampf Makes No Sense in This Context
The notion of trading Liljegren and Kampf, along with a draft pick, for a declining veteran misses the mark for the Maple Leafs strategy. While Liljegren has not progressed as much as hoped, he’s a former first-round pick. He represents future potential. Kampf, while not a star, is solid defensively. He makes few mistakes and offers versatility and depth.
Additionally, the draft pick holds potential long-term value. Trading these assets for Backlund, who is nearing the end of his career, does not address the Maple Leafs’ need to integrate younger players into their lineup.
The Maple Leafs Need to Create Opportunities for Their Youngsters
In conclusion, the proposed trade involving Backlund represents a significant win for the Flames and a major setback for the Maple Leafs. The deal would be a strategic coup for the Flames, perfectly aligning with their rebuilding efforts by adding valuable younger assets like Liljegren, Kampf, and a draft pick. They would eagerly seize this opportunity to accelerate their development process.
Conversely, the trade would be a costly misstep for the Maple Leafs. Acquiring Backlund, an aging player moving past his prime, risks impeding the growth of their younger talent. It would also be investing in someone who might not contribute significantly in the long run. This trade proposal reflects a short-sighted approach that fails to align with Toronto’s long-term goals. It could prove detrimental to its future.
The trade would be a massive loss for the Maple Leafs, highlighting a misalignment with their strategic vision. They need to find spots for their young players.
Related: Interesting Maple Leafs & Kraken Trade Might Just Work
BG
August 24, 2024 at 4:52 pm
As a Flames fan, I am in no hurry, nor do I even want to, trade Mikael Backlund. He is a top notch defensive C even at his age.
The point you are over looking in this column is that the Leafs want to win now. They can wait for the development of some of their younger centres. So a trade as proposed might make a lot of sense.
Roy James Peters
August 24, 2024 at 5:48 pm
Backlund at best on Leafs would be a 3rd line player no need for him better to develop younger player’s, I would say this trade idea is stupid who makes these trades up.
MoxNix
August 25, 2024 at 7:26 am
Dream on. Backlund would be the Leafs best defensive player on the entire team… Defensemen included!
MoxNix
August 25, 2024 at 7:25 am
Calgary wouldn’t even consider accepting your lowball hypothetical offer. An offer worthy of consideration would have to include Knies, Cowan or the Leafs 2026 1st round pick.
gcmgome
August 25, 2024 at 7:54 am
This is a new take on crazy off season trade proposals. Basically you post a trade dreamed up by someone for clickbait, then proceed to point out everything that is wrong with it. And there is a lot wrong with this one.
Let’s start with asking why the Leafs would want to get substantially older at the center position?
Then we can discuss why the Leafs would think of giving up their only early round pick for the 2025 draft?
The list goes on.
MoxNix
August 25, 2024 at 11:25 am
What’s wrong with this is the Flames wouldn’t even consider this garbage offger. If they decide to move Backlund they’ll get plenty of better offers for 2 playoff runs with one of the very best defensive centers in the league. A two way center who makes everyone who plays him better (constantly referred to as “The Backlund Bump”).
All the teams with better playoff prospects than the Leafs would be bidding on him. With retention he’ll easily fetch a late 1st and more.