A trade package involving Matvei Michkov and the Edmonton Oilers is making the rounds on social media, and the reaction has ranged from excitement to outright disbelief.
The proposed exchange would send Isaac Howard, a 2028 first-round pick and a third-round pick to the Philadelphia Flyers for Michkov. Before anyone starts drawing up Edmonton’s new lines, however, this needs to be taken with a considerable grain of salt. The suggestion comes from an unverified account, and the supplied posts provide no evidence that either team is discussing this package. It is a trade idea worth debating. That does not make it a deal worth expecting.
Why the Idea Appeals to Edmonton
Oilers receive: Matvei Michkov
Flyers receive: Isaac Howard, a 2028 first-round pick and a third-round pick
For Edmonton, the attraction is obvious. Michkov would offer another creative offensive winger to potentially play alongside Connor McDavid or Leon Draisaitl. His ability to find passing lanes and finish chances could make him a dangerous complement to either centre.
Michkov’s rookie production included 26 goals and 63 points in 80 games during the 2024–25 season. That established a meaningful NHL scoring foundation, rather than leaving his appeal entirely dependent on potential.
Playing with an elite centre could create more opportunities for Michkov to attack open space while opponents concentrate on stopping the puck carrier. Still, chemistry and increased production would need to be earned.
Philadelphia’s Reason to Decline Is Stronger
Howard would give Philadelphia an intriguing offensive piece. Edmonton acquired Howard from Tampa Bay for Sam O’Reilly in July 2025, demonstrating its willingness to invest in his upside. Adding a first-round selection and a third-rounder would broaden the return. If Philadelphia wanted to redistribute its assets, that combination would provide another young forward and additional draft capital.
The problem is explaining why the Flyers would choose that direction with Michkov. They would be surrendering a player who has already demonstrated NHL scoring ability for a package carrying considerably more uncertainty. Howard would need to develop, while the first-round pick would not even be used until 2028. Neither asset guarantees a replacement for Michkov’s offensive impact. Without a compelling reason to move him, Philadelphia would have little incentive to accept that risk.
The Comments Reflect the Credibility Problem
The comments show considerable scepticism. Dump The Puck dismissed the account as “Obviously a fake source,” while another commenter, That Guy, reacted to the proposed cost with: “Way too much.” Those responses illustrate how differently fans can assess both credibility and value. They do not establish whether any negotiations exist. One commenter, Doppa D, captured the optimistic reaction: “Michkov’s production would explode in Edmonton. Hope it’s true, but I doubt it.”
For Edmonton, this would be an enticing swing at adding offensive talent. For Philadelphia, the package needs a much stronger justification. Until credible evidence emerges, the sensible discussion is whether the trade makes hockey sense—not whether Michkov should start packing.
Next: Struggling Kings Considering Hellebuyck Trade, But There’s a Catch
Discover more from NHL Trade Talk
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
More News
