Gavin McKenna or Ivar Stenberg? Who Do the Canucks Need?

Picture the Vancouver Canucks snagging the top pick in the draft lottery. Who do the Canucks need most? That depends upon what the team thinks it needs.

The Canucks ended a horrible season. But there’s real potential for growth. You’ve got a young core that’s pretty solid. The defence isn’t a dumpster fire — Zeev Buium and Filip Hronek are promising. The middle six has room for growth, and Marco Rossi looks legit as a second-line center.

What you actually need is top-line scoring, preferably someone who can slide into a big role sooner rather than later. So here’s the lowdown on the two likely picks and how they fit Vancouver, with quick player sketches folded right into the decision.

---

---

Looking at the Two Biggest Options for the Canucks

Option A — Gavin McKenna (LW, Penn State) — The Flashy North American

Sketch: At 6-0 feet and 170 pounds, McKenna is a young NCAA guy with a real scorer/playmaker combo. He put up 15 goals and 36 assists in ~35 games this year. Plus, he had some clutch World Juniors moments. Scouts drool over his creativity, speed, puck skill, and ability to drive play. However, his defensive effort can be spotty and sometimes disappears when he’s away from the puck; consistency is the only real question.

Why he fits the Canucks: McKenna is the “instant bump” pick. Plug him on the wing with your top line, and he’ll create chances right away. He’s more of an NHL-ready offensive weapon than a long-term project. If the Canucks want to push now and give their young core a real scorer to play with, McKenna does that without years of babysitting.

Grade for Vancouver: A- — big immediate impact, lower risk if you want to compete sooner.

Option B — Ivar Stenberg (W, Frölunda/SHL) — The Safe Pro-Level Option

Sketch: At 5-foot-11 and 183 pounds, Stenberg has been playing in the SHL as a teenager and has put up around 11 goals and 22 assists in 43 pro games. He’s known for high hockey IQ, compete, and two-way reliability. Scouts call him safe with a strong floor; some rankings even had him flipping spots with McKenna, depending on the week.

Why he fits the Canucks: Stenberg is the steady piece who won’t be a headache. He’s more mature game-wise, can handle pro minutes sooner than most teenagers, and won’t get exposed defensively. He might not be as electric as McKenna. He’s less boom-or-bust and can be slotted into top-six minutes without major risk.

Grade for Vancouver: A- (maybe A if you value pro maturity) — lower upside than McKenna but higher floor and immediate pro readiness.

How Should the Canucks Actually Choose?

If the Canucks want to push now, they should take McKenna. He’s the more offensively dynamic option and the one most likely to flash top-line scoring right away. With Rossi holding down 2C, McKenna on the wing could be the perfect combo: speed + finishing = real Matthews help.

If the Canucks want safety and pro polish, they should take Stenberg. He’s the pick if you’d rather have a ready-made pro who won’t need much sheltering. He’s the safe glue guy who’ll give you minutes you can trust from day one.

Is There a Tie-breaker for Vancouver?

From my perspective, Rossi’s emergence at 2C makes the winger choice easier. You don’t strictly need another center. However, Vancouver fans and management probably want a visible improvement fast. And McKenna sells better in that respect. If you’re worried about defensive lapses or the risk of a hype machine stalling, Stenberg is the smarter long-term bet.

Final Ranking for the Canucks?

As you can probably tell, there’s a case for either player. I’d give both youngsters an A- for what they’d bring to the team. However, I’d likely go with Gavin McKenna because he has higher upside, brings immediate excitement, and would be a top-line scoring boost. Still, Ivar Stenberg might be a safer, pro-ready, reliable two-way player. He might have a lower ceiling, but he would be steadier.

If Vancouver gets lucky and can be slightly aggressive, take McKenna — he’s the missing spark for a team that already has Rossi and a young core. If management wants to hedge and keep things steady, Stenberg is the no-drama pick who still helps right away.

Either way, you’re getting a player who can slot into a good group and make the team better. The bigger choice really comes down to your risk tolerance.

Related: NHL Trade Talk Recap: Dach’s Error, Leafs’ GM & McDavid’s Health