The NHL Tried to Move On — Fans Didn’t After the Brad Marchand Ruling

The NHL’s decision not to discipline Brad Marchand for his hit on Mike Matheson has ignited exactly the kind of reaction the league claims it wants to avoid — a loud, angry, and deeply cynical backlash from fans who no longer believe player safety is applied consistently.

---

When the play happened, the initial reaction was almost unanimous. Fans, media members, and former players — at least those who didn’t feel the league had a bias toward the Panthers — assumed a hearing was coming. The head was the point of contact, Matheson was in a vulnerable position, and Marchand’s reputation led people to assume a supplemental statement would be on the way. The announcement that came instead sparked reactions like, “The NHL always talks a big game about eliminating head injuries. But in practice they very rarely make the right call when the chips are down. This is not the first, nor will it be the last, time that the NHL is soft on blatant head shots.”

The Department of Player Safety declined to even review the play, a decision that poured gasoline on an already smoldering fire.

The Reactions To the Non-Decision Were Loud Against the NHL

The comments that followed show how little respect fans have for the league and its safety department to do what’s right. Many zeroed in on what they see as selective enforcement — that star players and certain teams receive leniency when the calendar or marketing interests demand it.

The Winter Classic, Marchand’s 1,000-point milestone, and the NHL’s desire to keep marquee names on the ice were repeatedly cited as reasons fans believe the league “looked the other way.”

Others went further, questioning George Parros’ leadership and the overall credibility of the Department of Player Safety. Some argued that similar or even lesser hits have resulted in suspensions in the past, making the lack of a hearing here impossible to reconcile.

For example, Player Safety announced on Sunday that Winnipeg’s Logan Stanley will have a hearing today for roughing Ottawa’s Brady Tkachuk. Calgary’s John Beecher will have a hearing today for roughing Nashville’s Michael McCarron. It’s arguable both players were less dangerous than what Marchand did, yet the standard seems to be different.

Who delivers the hit often seems to matter more than how dangerous it actually is.

Did The NHL Get It Right?

Not everyone agreed that a suspension was warranted. A smaller group argued that Matheson’s low position contributed to the contact and that Marchand had already committed to the hit. But even among those voices, there was acknowledgment that the NHL has created this environment by failing to establish clear, predictable standards.

What’s most striking is how little surprise remains. Many fans didn’t react with shock, but resignation. “Same old NHL,” was the prevailing tone — a league that talks about eliminating head injuries, then hesitates when accountability becomes inconvenient.

Marchand has long lived on the edge, and that reputation ensures every borderline play will be magnified. But this reaction isn’t really about one player. It’s about a league that continues to struggle with credibility on player safety — and a fanbase that increasingly believes the rules change depending on who’s involved and what’s at stake.

Next: Penguins Suspend Newly Acquired D-Man After Bold AHL Decision