Two Jobs, One Mic: Rick Tocchet and the Cost of Being Honest

It has to be one of the most brutal balancing acts in hockey: standing behind a microphone and answering questions that aren’t really about winning games, while knowing that winning games is the actual job. Coaches understand the deal. Media availability isn’t optional. You show up, you answer, you keep things civil. But the tension lives right there—between what the coach is trying to build inside the room and what the media is trying to pull out of it.

---

Rick Tocchet Doesn’t Engage in Empty Rhetoric with the Media

Rick Tocchet has never been much for empty calories at the podium. He doesn’t filibuster. He doesn’t hide behind buzzwords. When you ask him a question, you usually get an honest answer. And that, oddly enough, is sometimes what gets him into trouble.

We saw it in Vancouver. Ask Tocchet about Elias Pettersson long enough, and eventually, he pushed back. “You guys are obsessed with Petey, huh?” he said once, clearly exasperated. Not angry, exactly—but tired. Tired of the same old framing. Tired of a complex team being reduced to a single storyline. The Canucks had other players playing well and different things happening, but the gravity of a star player bends coverage toward them. That’s the nature of the beast.

Tocchet in Philadelphia, Same Issue, But Different Players

Now Tocchet is in Philadelphia, and the names have changed, but the pattern hasn’t. This time it’s Matvei Michkov, the young Russian talent everyone wants to talk about, dissect, and project onto. Tocchet fields question after question, acknowledges the skill, points out the progress, and then does something that feels almost old-fashioned: he talks about team play. About defence. About learning how to win games, not highlights. And when the questions keep coming—five, six, seven versions of the same thing—you can hear the edge creep in.

This is where the job splits in two.

One job is public-facing. You respect the media. You answer honestly. You don’t embarrass anyone. Tocchet generally does all of that. The other job, the bigger one, is internal. You protect players. You reinforce habits. You send messages to the room about what matters. And sometimes those two jobs rub against each other in uncomfortable ways.

The Media Has a Job, But It’s Different from the Coach’s Job

The media isn’t wrong for asking about Pettersson or Michkov. Star players drive interest. That’s the business. But there’s also a kind of gravity well that forms—where everything gets pulled toward drama, pressure, and stress. It’s ambulance chasing without meaning to be—rubbernecking, more than reporting. And coaches, especially honest ones, feel that tension acutely.

What Tocchet seems to struggle with—and perhaps always will—is how to be transparent without feeding the machine. He wants to answer honestly, but honesty can sharpen focus in ways that aren’t always fair to young or high-profile players. He wants to defend the team concept, but the questions keep circling back to the individual.

There Are Few Solutions, But All NHL Coaches Face the Same Issue

There’s no clean solution here. If he shuts it down, he’s evasive. If he engages, he risks amplifying the very narrative he’s trying to tamp down. That’s the contest. That’s the job inside the job. And, all NHL coaches face it.

What Tocchet’s moments of frustration really reveal isn’t thin skin. It’s his different and pressing priority. He’s coaching hockey games, not fueling storylines. And when those two collide, he’s always going to lean toward the work—messy, unglamorous, team-first work—even if it makes for uncomfortable soundbites along the way.

Related: Future of Berube and Treliving In Toronto Has Been Determined