Maple Leafs Trade Auston Matthews; What Problems Get Fixed?

Talking about trades has a way of pretending things are decisive. If you move the star, the room resets and the story changes. In Toronto, those ideas always feel especially tempting when a season stalls.

Right now, that temptation has settled on Auston Matthews.

---

The Argument for Trading Matthews Goes Something Like This

People usually say it like this: Matthews isn’t carrying the team, his numbers are down, and maybe it’s time to shake things up. Trade him, and suddenly you’ve done something — even if it doesn’t fix anything.

But it’s worth slowing down long enough to ask a simple question: if you trade Matthews, what problem are you actually fixing?

Let’s Consider the Context in Which Matthews Plays

Start with the structure around him. For much of this season, Matthews has been centring a rotating cast of wingers — some young, some stopgaps, some asked to play above where they’re most comfortable. Chemistry has been fleeting. Continuity has been rare. The expectation, implicitly, has been that Matthews should solve that on his own. That’s not unusual in Toronto. But it’s just rarely acknowledged.

Trading him doesn’t magically stabilize those issues. It doesn’t create a top-line winger, clarify roles, or magically fix the system or cap. Those problems now belong to someone else. They remain, but now suddenly belong to someone else.

What Does It Mean that Matthews Isn’t Carrying the Maple Leafs?

Then there’s the idea of “carrying” a team. It’s used loosely, as if it were a personality trait rather than a circumstance. But what does “carrying the team” mean? Some stars carry teams because the roster is built to tilt that way. They’re insulated, supported, and given consistent partners. Others are asked to drag instability uphill every night and still dominate. Matthews has increasingly been asked to do the latter.

Matthews isn’t perfect. He hasn’t been lighting it up every game, and the Leafs could use more from him. But there’s a line between criticism that’s fair and criticism that’s misdirected. Moving him because the team’s broken? That’s really a confession that the rest of the team or system hasn’t been sorted.

So, How Does Trading Matthews Make the Maple Leafs’ Situation More Stable?

There’s also the portability question. Matthews’ value is obvious, but his situation isn’t easily transferable. A team trading for him would do so with a plan: defined wingers, a clear role, and an understanding of how he fits. Toronto’s frustration isn’t that Matthews lacks talent. It’s that the environment around him has become increasingly demanding and increasingly unstable.

A Matthews trade would feel like movement. It would dominate a news cycle. It might even provide temporary relief. But relief isn’t resolution.

Until the Maple Leafs are honest about what they’re asking their stars to absorb — and what they’re building around them — trading the captain doesn’t fix the problem people think it does. It just changes the subject. The real work is building around the players, not moving them around.

Related: For Maple Leafs Fans, It’s All Kyle Dubas’ Fault